![]() ![]() These are impressive default frequencies for a card that comes set up likes this directly out of the factory. The card comes with official PCI Express 3.0 support and has complete DirectX 11.1 support.ĪSUS’ GeForce GTX 660 DirectCU II TOP video card comes with an impressive 1072 MHz default GPU frequency in 3D mode and a 1137 MHz Boost frequency option when the application requires maximum performance. ![]() The 2048 MB of GDDR5 memory on the 192-bit memory BUS should provide a bandwidth of 144 GB/sec and, while considerably less than what AMD is able to achieve on its 384-bit BUS architecture, it is still enough to keep the GK106 well fed. ![]() The reference frequencies recommended by Nvidia for the GTX 660 video cards are 980 MHz for the GPU, 1033 MHz with the Boost activated and the usual 6008 MHz effective GDDR5 frequency. There are 80 TMUs and 24 ROPs inside this version of Kepler and, while there's less TMUs, the number of ROPs is the same as on the GeForce GTX 660 Ti. Getting back to the reference specifications of the GTX 660 architecture, we now know that the card comes with 960 active CUDA cores and works with a narrower 192-bit memory BUS. We know that the yields at TSMC are improving, but we believe that these are good enough right now, as Nvidia wouldn’t have designed such a big GK106 for the mid-range. This is a strange number for a video card, but it seems the company has decided that this is the sweet spot ratio between the die size, the yields per wafer and the performance. The new GK106 GPU sports no less than 960 CUDA units. This is also a Kepler-based chip, but it has a smaller die than the huge 3.5-billion transistor GK104 that’s inside all 600 series GeForce cards starting with GTX660 Ti. The GTX 660 consistently delivers great frame rate increases over the GTX 560, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti and it really justifies an upgrade.Moving the offensive to the $200 to $300 price range, Nvidia has just launched the GeForce GTX 660 video card that’s powered by the GK106 GPU. Fortunately, gaming performance was quite impressive. The GTX 660 has 2 GB RAM compared to the GTX 560 's 1 GB video memory. Spec for spec, this GTX 660 leapfrogs its direct predecessor, the GTX 560, by boasting 24.2 % more fps. After taking the time to fully test the Kepler graphics card inside the GTX 660, we can say without a doubt that it continues the trend. NVIDIA ’s x圆0 cards have always been defined by entry-level prices with performance that knocks on the door of mid-range graphics cards – especially when overclocked. The good news is, with the release of the GTX 660 Ti, the GTX 660 's price is getting more discount. On the other hand, the GTX 660 is closer to being reasonably affordable at a price tag of $ 229. The GTX 670 might be the mid-range flagship of the latest Kepler set of graphics cards, but their prices keep them out of the reach of most entry-level PC gamers. The GTX 670 consistently delivers great frame rate increases over the GTX 570 and it really justifies an upgrade.įor 1080p Full HD, we were able to play Valorant at 73 fps to 73 fps and kept frame rates hovering around 73 fps. In our synthetic benchmarks, the GTX 670 blows past the GTX 570 and, amazingly, even the GTX 580 as well. The GTX 670 has 2 GB RAM compared to the GTX 570 's 1.25 GB video memory. Spec for spec, this GTX 670 leapfrogs its direct predecessor, the GTX 570, by boasting 29.6 % more fps. After taking the time to fully test the Kepler graphics card inside the GTX 670, we can say without a doubt that it continues the trend. NVIDIA ’s xx70 cards have always been defined by mid-range prices with performance that knocks on the door of high-end graphics cards – especially when overclocked. On the other hand, the GTX 670 is closer to being reasonably affordable at a price tag of $ 399. The GTX 680 might be the high-end flagship of the latest Kepler set of graphics cards, but their prices keep them out of the reach of most mid-range PC gamers. The overall score is determined based on the calculated weightings for the individual components. The higher the better for higher resolution textures and future The higher the better.Ĭurrent CPU Impact on performance with respect to the highest performing CPU used for benchmark at the The higher the better.ĤK performance at 2160p resolution. The lower the better.įull HD performance at 1080p resolution. The lower the better for longer life of the graphics card. Power Supply Wattage required for overall system. The newer the better technology and performance optimization and ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |